Supreme Court Enhances Alimony to ₹50,000/Month – The Real Story
August 16, 2025 2025-08-16 20:07Supreme Court Enhances Alimony to ₹50,000/Month – The Real Story
Supreme Court Enhances Alimony to ₹50,000/Month – The Real Story
Keerti Date of SC Order: 29 May 2025
Case: Rakhi Sadhukhan vs. Raja Sadhukhan
Legal Provisions Involved: Section 27, Special Marriage Act and Calcutta High Court Judgement
Download the Judgments
Introduction
If you’ve been on social media recently, you’ve probably seen heated debates over a Supreme Court judgment where a divorced wife was granted ₹50,000/month in alimony and a house, despite the divorce being finalized years ago.
Many posts have framed this as the wife “taking advantage” of the husband—but as always, the real story is far more nuanced.
This post breaks down the complete timeline, the legal reasoning, and why this judgment matters.
Both the Supreme Court and Calcutta High Court judgments are linked at the end for you to read yourself.
📅 Timeline of the Case
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 18 June 1997 | Marriage solemnized between Rakhi Sadhukhan and Raja Sadhukhan. |
| 5 August 1998 | Couple blessed with a son. |
| July 2008 | Husband files for divorce on grounds of mental cruelty under Section 27, Special Marriage Act. |
| 10 Jan 2016 | Trial Court rejects divorce – rules there was no credible proof of mental cruelty. |
| 25 Jun 2019 | Calcutta High Court overturns trial court, grants divorce citing mental cruelty (special to this case) + irretrievable breakdown. |
| 31 Aug 2019 | Deadline for flat transfer to wife (mortgage redeemed by husband). |
| 2019 HC Orders | Wife awarded ₹20,000/month alimony (5% increase every 3 years), flat transfer, full education expenses for son, plus ₹5,000/month tuition. |
| 29 May 2025 | Supreme Court increases alimony to ₹50,000/month (5% hike every 2 years), upholds house transfer, discontinues son’s maintenance, preserves inheritance rights. |
Key Findings from the Calcutta High Court (2019)
The High Court observed:
“Not only has the marriage between the parties broken down irretrievably, the allegations of mental cruelty… were proved, by the above standards, which are special to this case. The acts complained of may not have caused the same to another husband.”
The court also tried to explore reconciliation but was absolutely certain there was no possibility at all—calling it a dead marriage.
Supreme Court Reasoning (2025)
In 2025, the wife appealed, arguing the ₹20,000/month alimony was insufficient given her marital standard of living.
The Supreme Court agreed, noting:
- The husband had remarried and was supporting a second wife and elderly parents.
- The wife had contributed over two decades to the marriage, raising their child and managing the home.
- Alimony should reflect the marital standard of living and adjust for inflation.
Final Supreme Court Directions:
- ₹50,000/month alimony
- 5% increase every 2 years
- House transfer to wife upheld
- Son’s maintenance stopped (he was independent at 26)
- Wife’s inheritance rights preserved
Why This Case Matters
- Sets a benchmark – Alimony must reflect marital lifestyle and inflation.
- Protects against abandonment – Prevents a spouse from discarding a partner after years of contribution and moving on without responsibility.
- Clarifies cruelty standards – What amounts to “mental cruelty” can be case-specific and not universally applicable.
- Reinforces accountability – Remarriage doesn’t erase prior commitments.
Final Thoughts
This case isn’t about “rewarding” one side—it’s about ensuring fairness after a long marriage.
It shows why headlines alone can mislead and why it’s important to read judgments in full before forming an opinion.
💬 Do you think the Supreme Court was right to increase the alimony?
Drop your thoughts in the comments.
📌 Follow for verified legal updates – No gossip. No half-truths. Only facts backed by court records.
